Whenever a prominent awards ceremony approaches, there’s always an outcry for introducing fresh award types to honor underappreciated efforts and delight the passions of followers who have specialized interests.
A fellow writer previously argued for a horror game category. That would rule. Equally deserving are board games, which is someone's personal cause. Yet I need to apologize in advance when I prioritize since similar to blinkered fanatics, I have a cast-iron argument for why my demand is the most urgent and significant. This is the request: It's essential to create an award type for logic-based games.
Organizing Gaming Categories
Organizing artistic expressions is not a science; it’s very subjective, and typically generate discussions resulting in unclear classifications. This explains why movie academies don’t do it. But it is an unavoidable compromise for the industry of video games, which are so diverse it's challenging to consider them one unified medium.
For comprehensive acknowledgment of achievement in video games to receive acknowledgment, and to ensure all game types to compete fairly, genre categories are essential.
Current Gaming Award Categories
Leading game ceremonies presently include award types recognizing Action, Action/Adventure, Role-Playing, Combat games, Simulation and strategy titles, and Sports/Racing games. Between them, these classifications actually cover a lot of ground, allowing placement for most games within them.
This doesn't apply to logic-based experiences. No suitable classification appears for their placement. Consider three of recent excellent titles, all very different: the architectural riddles of one title, fast-paced pattern recognition in a different title, and the sweetly sociological logic puzzles in another game. Where could they possibly go between these six categories? Unfortunately, nowhere.
The Representation Problem
There are dozens excellent brain-teasers published annually lacking appropriate categories at major award shows, if they accidentally match for categories like Handheld titles, Virtual reality experiences, or the intensely contested small studio competitions.
- An iconic brain-teaser received no recognition for anything during that awards season
- Another creative title missed out during that ceremony
- Popular arranging title received no acknowledgment that year
- Limited numbers of brain-teasers scraped into independent or mobile categories
Value of Brain-Teasers
Commonly they're small games, however the design in brain-teasers is of massive significance. Iconic mobile puzzle games stand as the most-played games globally and have been for an extended period.
The iconic tile-matching title competes with well-known building titles competing to become highest-selling title ever; it additionally competes for best game of all time. Logic titles represent cornerstones within interactive entertainment, while interacting with diverse game types.
Proposal and Rationale
Logic titles wouldn't face such difficulty. It would be easy to populate multiple candidates interesting, varied, worthy titles every year with ease — actually, with challenge, since numerous excellent many worthy titles.
To emphasize again, these are games that otherwise have no home during prominent ceremonies. Brain-teaser creators operate at the challenging frontier game development, developing some of essential manifestations within interactive entertainment. Just like film action specialists, they deserve recognition. We shouldn't delay decades.
